<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Justin Beller &#187; articulate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.justinbeller.com/tag/articulate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.justinbeller.com</link>
	<description>Training and Development, Workplace Performance Improvement Specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Instructional Design Is Not Dying, but Rapid E-Learning Tools Aren&#8217;t Helping</title>
		<link>http://www.justinbeller.com/2010/07/instructional-design-is-not-dying-but-rapid-e-learning-tools-arent-helping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.justinbeller.com/2010/07/instructional-design-is-not-dying-but-rapid-e-learning-tools-arent-helping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Beller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe captivate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articulate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instructional design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justinbeller.com/2010/07/instructional-design-is-not-dying-but-rapid-e-learning-tools-arent-helping/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent “Tweet” on my Twitter account of a blog post I found generated a lot of traffic and discussion around whether or not the field of instructional design is suffering due to the popularity of rapid e-learning applications like Adobe Captivate or Articulate’s Engage and Presenter. It’s not that rapid e-learning tools are entirely [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/PinPoint/status/17599597181">A recent “Tweet” on my Twitter account</a> of a blog post I found generated a lot of traffic and discussion around whether or not the field of instructional design is suffering due to the popularity of rapid e-learning applications like <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/captivate/">Adobe Captivate</a> or <a href="http://www.articulate.com/">Articulate’s Engage and Presenter</a>.</p>
<p>It’s not that rapid e-learning tools are entirely replacing trainers or instructional designers. They are, however, becoming a preferred choice of developing and delivering training in the corporate world. Their ease of use and overall cost is relatively low compared to the more traditional forms of training. Nevertheless, these software applications are merely tools and in the hands of inexperienced instructional designers or subject matter experts tapped as trainers, they are ineffective.</p>
<p>Instructional designers&#160; have their place in the training process as they analyze and validate training needs. With their knowledge of adult learning and how to maximize the potential of each learner, they can organize and present the content in a fashion that is easy to learn and relevant to the learner. More importantly, they can create activities and exercises that give the learner an immediate opportunity to demonstrate what they learned and get corrective feedback.</p>
<p>Sadly, I have to agree with the author of the blog post that inspired this particular post that some companies are trading quality for speed. While it is understandable that managers and human resource departments need people to be trained quickly and efficiently, the science behind adult learning often gets overlooked.</p>
<p>I feel the profession instructional design is losing some ground as being an established function within organizations. This is largely due to the economy. When cuts in a company need to be made, training is often the first to go as instructional designers are largely a support and administration function of an organization. They are not a line function, which generates revenue directly for a company. Such cuts, in my opinion, are not necessarily a wise move as I discussed in a <a href="http://www.pinpointperformance.net/blogs/justin_beller/cutting_training_down_economy_not_smart_move">previous post</a>.</p>
<p>Rapid e-learning tools, in place of qualified instructional designers and trainers give a false impression that anybody can put together training and I hope that changes when the economy turns around. Instructional designers must do a better job demonstrating their value within their organizations. At PinPoint, we’re happy to say we use rapid e-learning tools, but we back-up everything we produce with sound instructional design.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.justinbeller.com/2010/07/instructional-design-is-not-dying-but-rapid-e-learning-tools-arent-helping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

